Patent a Product - This is So You Are the Only Legal Manufacturer of it For 17 Years

the law

The purpose to patent a product is for legal protection against the infringement of your product and its idea. This is what a patent is, legal protection against any domestic and foreign company from importing and selling your product for a profit without your consent.

Most patent applications are rejected on their first submission. Although it is known that patent officers prefer to discuss the finer points of an application with an approved patent attorney because an attorney understands the process better and is easier to deal with than inventors, even the ones who hired a USPTO-approved attorney to get it approved also get rejected. This is just the US government bureaucracy at work.

Hiring an attorney for any reason is very expensive. If your idea is a sure money maker, then before you file the patent, make a business plan with your product as the center and sell shares or get investors. This will help raise the capital needed to push through the patent.

Once you have filed your patent, keeping the details of your product a secret should still be done. It is true the patent is on file and the term patent pending is applicable, but you are not totally protected yet. The patent approval process could take up to 2 years to complete, so basically keep your mouth shut about it.

If there is not a need to let someone know the details about your product, then do not share it. This is all a part of a good business plan. Keep your secrets, secret. It is a good idea to patent a product that will provide you and your family with a revenue stream for the next 17 years.

Judas Priest – Breaking The Law

None is above the law in Singapore, right?

Excerpt from CNA: Appealing to keep her out of jail, the lawyer Naresh Mahtani, Peter said he had to take care of their children, aged six and nine years, while her husband was away on mission in flight. Justice VK Rajah decided to annul the sentence prison, saying that Peter was not likely to reoffend. He added that "this decision does not mean the current legal situation … but it is a case of compensation commands are a deviation from the norm. "Peter had paid the fine imposed previously for drunk driving, spent five days in jail and has been disqualified driving. What is the signal here?

Like when Michael Faye has jail and cane for spray paint will dry with thinner and the only evidence that his admission of guilt, while the boy who set fire to Changi Secondary School Kat Chang destruction of all schools computers and sports equipment only got probation. My son was one of the many who did not receive computer education in high school because recklessness. However, when you could only read about Michael Faye in the Straits Times. Singapore law as the law of Singapore.